This is my first "Aside." This portion of the blog will be short observations and/or predictions that may not have a large amount of hard evidence, but that I believe will be important in the future.
I just heard a quote from Barack Obama's recent interview with Fox News. (Yes, I said Fox News.) His statement was: If the government keeps going further in debt, people in the US might lose faith in the government, and we might have a double-dip recession.... We haven't lost faith in the government yet? Look at the debt clock! Does it cause you to have more faith in the government? The site is not run or supported by a political organization. Notice how much more quickly the "US Spending Calendar Year to Date" figure is increasing compared to "US Federal Tax Revenue," (resulting in the "US Budget Deficit" number). Have you lost faith yet?!
Showing posts with label deficit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deficit. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
An aside: Government debt
Labels:
congress,
constitution,
debt,
deficit,
federal,
government,
president,
rights,
taxes,
united states
How do we fix healthcare?
Some Democrats are today attempting to pass legislation providing government-sponsored health care. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and others have even gone as far as saying Americans have a "right" to health care and that the national government has a responsibility to provide health care to those who cannot afford it.
Interestingly, the health care and insurance system has developed into its present condition largely as a result of previous congressional decisions not to consider health care a commercial activity. Those decisions have left states to develop regulations for health care and insurance within their borders.
Today, after more than two centuries of relatively little federal regulation, Democrats say that Congress now has an important responsibility to provide health care for "every American."
Democrats argue that the present condition of the health care system indicates that we cannot trust the system to develop efficiently; therefore Congress must regulate and support it.
The problem with this argument is that it takes two steps at once. The system is currently state-regulated and primarily supported by non-governmental sources. The Speaker of the House would change the system to be Congress-regulated and primarily supported by governmental sources.
Those who desire government-provided health care assume it is commerce and therefore properly regulated by Congress, but they would skip the intermediate step of private support regulated by Congress. Nearly every other commercial activity has thrived under this capitalistic structure. Congress should attempt to regulate one private system before it attempts to take over and coordinate fifty different systems.
Interestingly, the health care and insurance system has developed into its present condition largely as a result of previous congressional decisions not to consider health care a commercial activity. Those decisions have left states to develop regulations for health care and insurance within their borders.
Today, after more than two centuries of relatively little federal regulation, Democrats say that Congress now has an important responsibility to provide health care for "every American."
Democrats argue that the present condition of the health care system indicates that we cannot trust the system to develop efficiently; therefore Congress must regulate and support it.
The problem with this argument is that it takes two steps at once. The system is currently state-regulated and primarily supported by non-governmental sources. The Speaker of the House would change the system to be Congress-regulated and primarily supported by governmental sources.
Those who desire government-provided health care assume it is commerce and therefore properly regulated by Congress, but they would skip the intermediate step of private support regulated by Congress. Nearly every other commercial activity has thrived under this capitalistic structure. Congress should attempt to regulate one private system before it attempts to take over and coordinate fifty different systems.
Labels:
bill of rights,
congress,
constitution,
debt,
deficit,
federal,
government,
health,
health care,
insurance,
president,
rights,
taxes,
united states
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)